• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the concept that the natural processes that organisms go through can lead to their development over time. This includes the emergence and development of new species.

This has been proven by many examples such as the stickleback fish species that can thrive in saltwater or fresh water and walking stick insect types that prefer specific host plants. These typically reversible traits do not explain the fundamental changes in the basic body plan.

Evolution through Natural Selection

Scientists have been fascinated by the evolution of all the living creatures that inhabit our planet for ages. The best-established explanation is that of Charles Darwin's natural selection process, a process that occurs when individuals that are better adapted survive and reproduce more effectively than those that are less well adapted. Over time, the population of well-adapted individuals becomes larger and eventually forms a new species.

Natural selection is an ongoing process that involves the interaction of three elements that are inheritance, variation and reproduction. Variation is caused by mutations and sexual reproduction, both of which increase the genetic diversity of the species. Inheritance refers the transmission of a person's genetic traits, which include recessive and dominant genes to their offspring. Reproduction is the generation of viable, fertile offspring, which includes both asexual and sexual methods.

All of these factors have to be in equilibrium to allow natural selection to take place. If, for example, a dominant gene allele causes an organism reproduce and last longer than the recessive allele then the dominant allele is more prevalent in a group. If the allele confers a negative advantage to survival or lowers the fertility of the population, it will disappear. The process is self-reinforcing, which means that an organism that has an adaptive trait will live and reproduce more quickly than those with a maladaptive trait. The higher the level of fitness an organism has as measured by its capacity to reproduce and survive, is the greater number of offspring it can produce. People with desirable traits, like having a longer neck in giraffes and bright white patterns of color in male peacocks, are more likely to survive and have offspring, which means they will eventually make up the majority of the population in the future.

Natural selection is only an aspect of populations and not on individuals. This is a major distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution which claims that animals acquire characteristics through use or disuse. For instance, if the Giraffe's neck grows longer due to stretching to reach prey, its offspring will inherit a longer neck. The differences in neck length between generations will persist until the neck of the giraffe becomes too long that it can no longer breed with other giraffes.

Evolution by Genetic Drift

In genetic drift, the alleles within a gene can attain different frequencies in a group by chance events. Eventually, 에볼루션 바카라 슬롯게임 (https://git.lewd.wtf/evolution4980/diane1981/wiki/Why-You-Should-Not-Think-About-Enhancing-Your-Free-Evolution) one of them will reach fixation (become so widespread that it can no longer be eliminated through natural selection), while other alleles will fall to lower frequencies. In the extreme this, it leads to a single allele dominance. The other alleles are essentially eliminated, and heterozygosity falls to zero. In a small number of people, this could result in the complete elimination the recessive gene. This scenario is called a bottleneck effect, and it is typical of evolutionary process when a lot of people migrate to form a new population.

A phenotypic bottleneck may also occur when survivors of a disaster like an outbreak or a mass hunting event are concentrated in the same area. The survivors will carry a dominant allele and thus will have the same phenotype. This situation could be caused by war, earthquakes, 무료에볼루션; euro2020Ticket.net, or even plagues. Whatever the reason, the genetically distinct population that remains could be susceptible to genetic drift.

Walsh, Lewens and Ariew define drift as a deviation from the expected value due to differences in fitness. They cite the famous example of twins who are genetically identical and share the same phenotype, but one is struck by lightning and dies, whereas the other lives to reproduce.

This type of drift can play a very important role in the evolution of an organism. But, it's not the only method to develop. The primary alternative is a process called natural selection, in which the phenotypic variation of an individual is maintained through mutation and migration.

Stephens argues there is a vast difference between treating the phenomenon of drift as a force or cause, and treating other causes like migration and selection mutation as forces and causes. He argues that a causal process explanation of drift allows us to distinguish it from these other forces, and this distinction is essential. He also argues that drift is a directional force: that is it tends to eliminate heterozygosity. He also claims that it also has a specific magnitude that is determined by the size of population.

Evolution through Lamarckism

Students of biology in high school are often introduced to Jean-Baptiste Lemarck's (1744-1829) work. His theory of evolution is commonly known as "Lamarckism" and it states that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms via the inheritance of characteristics that are a result of an organism's natural activities, use and disuse. Lamarckism is illustrated through the giraffe's neck being extended to reach higher levels of leaves in the trees. This process would result in giraffes passing on their longer necks to their offspring, which then become taller.

Lamarck was a French Zoologist. In his opening lecture for his course on invertebrate zoology held at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th of May in 1802, he presented a groundbreaking concept that radically challenged previous thinking about organic transformation. In his opinion, living things had evolved from inanimate matter through the gradual progression of events. Lamarck wasn't the first to make this claim but he was considered to be the first to provide the subject a comprehensive and general overview.

The prevailing story is that Lamarckism grew into an opponent to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection and both theories battled out in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually prevailed and led to what biologists refer to as the Modern Synthesis. The Modern Synthesis theory denies the possibility that acquired traits can be acquired through inheritance and instead, it argues that organisms develop by the symbiosis of environmental factors, such as natural selection.

Although Lamarck supported the notion of inheritance by acquired characters and his contemporaries also paid lip-service to this notion but it was not a major feature in any of their theories about evolution. This is partly due to the fact that it was never validated scientifically.

It's been over 200 year since Lamarck's birth and in the field of age genomics, 무료 에볼루션 there is a growing body of evidence that supports the heritability-acquired characteristics. It is sometimes called "neo-Lamarckism" or more often, epigenetic inheritance. It is a form of evolution that is just as relevant as the more popular Neo-Darwinian model.

Evolution by adaptation

One of the most popular misconceptions about evolution is that it is being driven by a struggle to survive. This notion is not true and ignores other forces driving evolution. The struggle for survival is more accurately described as a struggle to survive within a particular environment, which may include not just other organisms, 에볼루션 바카라 무료 but as well the physical environment.

Understanding adaptation is important to understand evolution. Adaptation refers to any particular feature that allows an organism to survive and reproduce in its environment. It could be a physiological structure such as feathers or fur or a behavior, such as moving into shade in hot weather or coming out at night to avoid cold.

The survival of an organism depends on its ability to extract energy from the environment and to interact with other living organisms and their physical surroundings. The organism must have the right genes to produce offspring and to be able to access enough food and resources. The organism must be able to reproduce itself at the rate that is suitable for its particular niche.

These factors, in conjunction with mutations and gene flow can result in an alteration in the ratio of different alleles in a population’s gene pool. As time passes, this shift in allele frequency can lead to the emergence of new traits and ultimately new species.

Many of the features we admire in plants and animals are adaptations. For example lung or gills that extract oxygen from air, fur and feathers as insulation long legs to run away from predators, and camouflage to hide. However, a thorough understanding of adaptation requires a keen eye to the distinction between physiological and behavioral characteristics.

Physiological traits like the thick fur and gills are physical characteristics. Behavior adaptations aren't, such as the tendency of animals to seek out companionship or retreat into shade during hot temperatures. It is important to note that the absence of planning doesn't make an adaptation. A failure to consider the implications of a choice even if it appears to be logical, can cause it to be unadaptive.